logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.06.21 2015가단226356
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 4 million to Plaintiff A, and for this, KRW 5% per annum from March 15, 2017 to June 21, 2017; and (b).

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant was convicted of a fine of KRW 80,00,000 on June 16, 2016 for the following facts constituting a crime in Daejeon District Court 2016 Go-Ma192

[On July 15, 2015, the Defendant was acquitted on the ground that there is a lack of evidence to prove that the Defendant was false in relation to the violation of the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection (Defamation) by the Defendant, the victim A, and the Defendant was indicted. The Defendant was the former auditor of the Daejeon-dong D Apartment.

1. On June 3, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the post office located in Hongdodong-dong-gu Daejeon, Daejeon; (b) even though there was no fact that the victim A, who was the president of the former occupant of the D apartment, embezzled the construction cost and management fee of the apartment house and wrongfully dismissed the former apartment management office E, the Defendant has damaged the victim’s name by citing the total amount of KRW 55 million, such as apartment conduitri, etc.; (c) embling the apartment house management office with a cover of a dule with the former management office; and (d) sending the document of “the thickness of the resident representative” to six members, such as Ampt Management Director F, and publicly pointing out false facts.

2. On June 26, 2015, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts in a way of openly inserting each household mail, so that the total number of household residents can see the document under the title “the thickness of the representatives of occupants” under the above Paragraph 1. from the above apartment.

3. From July 18, 2015 to July 22, 2015, the Defendant: (a) against the total of 110 households residing in the said apartment complex with 101 Dong and 102 Dong residents; (b) even though the victim did not engage in an unlawful act during his/her term of office, the Defendant, etc., was released from the public of corruption and unfair act during his/her term of office, and became the residents of the Republic of Korea.

A The Chairperson has made a three-month meeting jointly with the present, which is a difficult board.

The question of how A and the Chairperson are impeded.

arrow