(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.01.30 2013고정2987

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.01.30 2013고정2987

사문서위조등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From the end of July 2010, the Defendant of defamation: (a) was made in an irregular manner without obtaining the written consent of non-Confidence of at least 1/3 from one occupant, the victim D, the representative of Dong (Dong) and was dismissed pursuant to the Multi-Family Housing Management Rules; (b) was made on the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the top, “A notice of dismissal under the non-Confidence of residents: (c) : the council of occupants’ representatives; (d) the chief of the management office; and (e) the head of the management office; and (d) the notice of dismissal under the non-Confidence of residents of one representative D; and (e) the lower part of the first part of the said Act signed and sealed the non-Confidence of at least 1/3 of the occupants, as attached with the written consent of non-Confidence of the non-

After expanding and copying each document described as ‘A3 paper size, the document attached the copy to the sports center wall in the apartment complex and attached the copy to publicly indicate false facts, thereby impairing the honor of the victim.

2. Interference with business;

A. On July 26, 2010, the Defendant: (a) at the meeting room of the second floor of the above apartment management office; (b) while the victim D’s regular meetings of the said apartment 10th regular meetings of the council of occupants’ representatives, the victim was dismissed by the due process of the meeting with the court; (c) although the victim D did not have been automatically dismissed by the due process of the meeting, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim’s meeting for about 20 minutes, such as spreading false facts, and

B. On March 24, 2011, the Defendant, at the above conference room, obstructed the work regarding the progress of the victim D’s general conference by force, such as: (a) the victim D’s regular meeting of the 24th council of occupants’ representatives of the said apartment complex, “Isssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss are not the chairman, and Dssssssssssssssssssssssssss

3. The Defendant, on May 31, 2012, was Asansan-ro 404 Seoul, Seoul Eastern District Court, and No. 2012, 619.

유사 판례

-서울동부지방법원 2015.08.12 2015노247

-서울동부지방법원 2017.07.05 2015가단37116

-서울중앙지방법원 2014.04.24 2012가단85357

-서울남부지방법원 2014.01.20 2013고단413

-대전지방법원 2014.08.13 2014고정484