logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.02.15 2015고정745
명예훼손등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the resident of Busan-gun C Apartment, and the victim D (the victim of 1945) has served as the management office warden from May 1, 2007 to the above apartment from May 1, 2007.

1. The Defendant was assaulted on May 16, 2012 at the above apartment management office around 12:10 on May 16, 2012, whether “the Defendant talks with the principal, and makes a false statement.”

If the Doo water or sark sark kb kb, the victim abused the victim by tightly pushing the victim's chest and face in hand.

2. The Defendant of defamation, around 11:30 on August 16, 2014, had a large number of residents at the monthly meeting held at the senior male community of the above apartment house, and received the result of the apartment audit without a receipt of KRW 40 million by the head of the management office.

In this regard, the number of billion won is deducted and the food residents report damages.

“Fastly sound”.

However, no victim has embezzled the above apartment fund.

Then, the Defendant stated that “(1) A revision of the Management Rules - The amendment of the Management Rules shall be deliberated by the representatives of the above-mentioned senior citizens in accordance with the Busan Metropolitan City Rules and shall be decided by the occupants “n’t”. The C Apartment Management Rules cannot be recognized as having been made up of gabs, which constitutes an alteration of private documents, and this constitutes a normal modification of private documents, and the representative of the above-mentioned organization shall be directly deliberated in accordance with the Rules and shall be required to make a normal amendment by obtaining a resolution from the residents.”

“The document was attached to the title “......”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement made by the defendant in this Court;

1. Each statement made by the witness D or E in this Court;

1. Each description of the public notice (Evidence No. 22-24) and the meeting data of the representatives of occupants (No. 28-32 pages);

1. Application of each of the video-related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs attached to a written public notice (section 25, 26), violence photographs (section 33-36)

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow