The defendant is not guilty. The summary of this judgment shall be announced publicly.

1. The Defendant, along with B and C in the facts charged, intentionally stops at the word “non-light” method or left or left-hand turn line, of a vehicle changing the vehicle, which is left or left-hand, and is going to enter the intersection, and agreed to claim insurance money from an insurance company within the traffic accident by intentionally claiming the left-hand turn or left-hand turn turn turn-hand turn-on.

On September 22, 2015, the Defendant: (a) in collusion with B and C, on September 15, 2015, 15, 15:50, 200 won was collected from the victim 3,228,000 won in terms of agreement, treatment, etc., for the use of the E driver’s vehicle on the D-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W

2. According to the legal statement of the witness B in the judgment, black image (Evidence No. 90), investigation report (C. 1, 2, and 2, the defendant was found to have received the above mixed passenger vehicle even though he stopped while trying to turn to the left in violation of the B’s signal at the time and could fully stop the operation of the operation system, and even if he was able to fully stop the operation of the operation system, the above mixed passenger vehicle could be acknowledged. In light of the background of the bnd and the accident after the occurrence of the bnd and the statement that is inconsistent with the defendant B and the situation after the bnd and the situation after the bnd, the defendant was hospitalized in the same hospital. However, there is a strong doubt that the defendant was not involved in the bnd crime, but the relationship between the defendant and the B recognized by this court after being duly adopted and investigated.