The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On February 2010, the summary of the facts charged in the instant case: (a) upon the expiration of the maturity of the periodical installment payment subscribed to C by the Defendant’s wife on or around February 2010; (b) upon termination of the aforementioned C following the death; (c) in mind, the Defendant would have to start the place of business to the Nonparty D, who is on the duty of the Saemaul Bank, to recover the amount of money equivalent to the installment savings; and (d) around that time, the Defendant would bring about

“Along with the foregoing,” the D is “a letter, seal, or personal identification card.”

The answer was “....”

Thus, the defendant sent the D above D to the residence of C in Jeju-si E on February 2010.

He shall cause C to use “Neman’s resident registration certificates and personal seal impressions, and Neman’s license.”

I.

The phrase “a woman’s resident registration certificate and seal imprint” was sent from C to C after having his woman’s resident registration certificate and seal imprint affixed.

On February 17, 2010, the Defendant continued to receive a delegation from “G Saemaul Savings Depository” located in the Jeju-si, which was located in the name of his/her woman from “G Saemaul Savings Depository”, and even if the Defendant did not know the name of his/her employee, he/she was delegated to the employees of the said Saemaul Savings Depository, and requested the termination of installment savings in the name of C, a certified copy of resident registration, resident registration certificate, passbook in the name of C, and seal indicating his/her family relationship with “C”, and the Defendant was charged with KRW 21,339,396 of the maturity termination refund with respect to C’s installment savings account number H, and KRW 17,459,506 of the credit account number I.

As a result, the Defendant received a total of KRW 38,798,902 from the refund on termination of the maturity of the installment savings account owned by the Victim G Saemaul Bank.

2. Determination

A. The recognition of facts constituting an offense in a criminal trial shall be based on strict evidence of probative value, which leads a judge to such a degree that there is no room for a reasonable doubt. Therefore, the prosecutor’s proof is sufficient to ensure such conviction.