logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.09.21 2017노102
사기
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence presented by the Prosecutor with the gist of the grounds for appeal, the fact that the Defendant, even though having not been entrusted by C with the termination of the installment savings account, was aware of the fact that the Defendant, as if he was delegated by C, obtained the refund upon termination of the maturity of the

Nevertheless, the lower court found the Defendant not guilty of the facts charged of this case.

2. Determination

A. On February 2010, the summary of the facts charged in the instant case: (a) upon the completion of the due date of the regular amount of money subscribed to C by the Defendant’s wife on or around February 2010; (b) upon termination of the said period, the Defendant thought that he would terminate the said period and use the money equivalent to the installment savings; and (c) around that time, the Defendant would bring about the person who was dispatched to the foreign village of the same family in the name of the head of the Saemaul Treasury to

“Along with the foregoing,” the D is “a letter, seal, or personal identification card.”

The answer was “....”

Thus, the defendant sent the D above D to the residence of C in Jeju-si E on February 2010.

He shall cause C to use “Neman’s resident registration certificates and personal seal impressions, and Neman’s license.”

I.

The phrase “a woman’s resident registration certificate and seal imprint” was sent from C to C after having his woman’s resident registration certificate and seal imprint affixed.

On February 17, 2010, the Defendant continued to receive a delegation from “G Saemaul Savings Depository” located in the Jeju-si, which was located in the name of his/her woman from “G Saemaul Savings Depository”, and even if the Defendant did not know the name of his/her employee, he/she was delegated to the employees of the said Saemaul Savings Depository, and requested the termination of installment savings in the name of C, a certified copy of resident registration, resident registration certificate, passbook in the name of C, and seal indicating his/her family relationship with “C”, and the Defendant was charged with KRW 21,339,396 of the maturity termination refund with respect to C’s installment savings account number H, and KRW 17,459,506 of the credit account number I.

In this respect, the Defendant above.

arrow