logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.07 2016나53694
손해배상
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court of the first instance’s explanation as to the instant case is as stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for the second instance judgment, and thus, citing it pursuant to Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. On May 24, 2017, the first instance judgment of the first instance court, 3, 5, “The Plaintiff filed an appeal against 10,00 won and the lawsuit is pending in the court of final appeal.” The above appellate judgment became final and conclusive after the Plaintiff filed an appeal against 10,00 won on October 27, 2016 (Supreme Court Decision 2016Da3292), and “the Plaintiff was issued a medical certificate of diagnosis.” In addition, on May 24, 2017, the Plaintiff paid 30,000 won to 10,000,000 won from 10,000 won to 30,000,000 won for the first instance judgment, and the Defendant was issued a written opinion that “the Defendant would need continuous observation and treatment of 10,000 won for 4,000,0000 won for 10,0000,000 won for 10,0000,000 won.”

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is without merit.

arrow