1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant and the plaintiff's claims added by this court are dismissed.

2. Appeal;

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and it is reasonable to accept the reasoning of this judgment, except for the dismissal or addition.

2. 고치거나 추가하는 부분 ▣ 제1심판결문 중 각 ‘원고 회사’를 각 ‘원고’로 고침 ▣ 제1심판결문

1. 기초사실 ‘라’ 항 중 각 ‘이 법원’을 각 ‘서울동부지방법원’으로 고침 ▣ 제1심판결문 제3쪽 아래에서 2행 ‘항소하여 현재 항소심에 계속 중이다’ 부분을 ‘항소하였으나 2015. 12. 18. 검사와 피고의 항소를 모두 기각하는 판결이 선고되었고(서울동부지방법원 2015노1100), 검사와 피고가 모두 상고하지 아니하여 그 무렵 피고에 대한 위 형사판결이 확정되었다’로 고침 ▣ 제1심판결문 제4쪽 4행 내지 5행 ‘현재 C의 상고로 대법원에 계속중이다(이 법원 2013고단2559호, 2015노73)’ 부분을 ‘C가 상고하였으나 2016. 2. 18. 상고기각 판결이 선고되어 C에 대한 위 형사판결이 확정되었다(서울동부지방법원 2013고단2559호, 같은 법원 2015노73, 대법원 2015도13615)’로 고침 ▣ 제1심판결문

1. In addition to the basic facts as follows, Gap evidence 19 is added to the grounds for recognition:

F. Meanwhile, when the criminal judgment on the Defendant and the Plaintiff’s representative director C became final and conclusive, the head of Gangseo-gu Tax Office and the head of Gangdong-gu Tax Office imposed corporate tax, value-added tax, wage and salary tax, and resident tax on the Plaintiff as follows:

Value-added tax 6,150,070 for year 207 or 2007 or 11,391,680 for corporate tax in 207 or 2008 for value-added tax 5,656,950 for year 2008 or 10,529,110 for value-added tax in 2008 or 15,165,180 for corporate tax in 208 or 3,761,510 for wage and salary income tax in 2008 or 376,150 for resident tax in 207 or 207 for resident tax of 10,213,810 for year 208.