logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.06.29 2016가합1379
공사대금
Text

Defendant B Co., Ltd.: 120,000,000 won to the Plaintiff (Appointeds) and 40,000,000 won to the Appointed Co., Ltd.

Reasons

1. Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) entered into a claim against the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated parties (hereinafter “Plaintiff, etc.”). Since the Plaintiff, etc. entered into a subcontract for part of each part of the construction works the Plaintiff, etc. took charge of, and the Plaintiff, etc. completed the relevant construction work, it does not pay the construction cost. As such, Defendant C is seeking payment of the unpaid construction cost indicated in the attached Table “the total amount payable” column. Since Defendant C jointly and severally guaranteed the obligation to Jinjin Co., Ltd., Ltd., Defendant B’s designated parties, Defendant C, the guaranteed obligation against the Defendant C by publication (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act).

arrow