logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2013.04.23 2013고단18
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

A fine of three million won shall be imposed on a defendant.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a small-scale car B.

At around 11:00 on December 1, 2012, the Defendant driven the said car at the top of a beneficiary hospital in front of the village per unit of the village located in the terminal.

Since there is a center line of yellow solid lines, in such a case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive the center line.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and proceeded with the opposite direction of the victim C(34 years old) driving due to the negligence that led to the central line, and the front part of the victim C(34 years old) driving was shocked by the front part of the defendant vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, suffered injury to the victim C, such as Madern salt, etc. requiring approximately three weeks of medical treatment, injury to the victim E (the 34 years of age), the victim E (the 34 years of age) with no open address for about six weeks of medical treatment, and injury to the victim F (the 9 years of age) of the son, such as Madern base and tension in need of medical treatment for about two weeks of medical treatment, and injury to the victim G (the son, the son, the son of the Defendant vehicle), such as Madern base and tension in need of medical treatment for about two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a survey report on actual conditions, on-site photographs, a copy of a medical certificate (G, one other), and a medical certificate (E and two other persons);

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso of Article 3 (2) and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow