Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a leisure car B.

On June 28, 2013, around 20:30 on the 20:30, the Defendant driven and proceeded with the above-mentioned car in the direction of Osan in the direction of the apartment apartment in the Yansan-gu, the 13-3rd of the wind power model in the Yan-gu.

Since there is a center line of yellow solid lines, there was a duty of care to safely drive the yellow solid lines.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went beyond the central line and was negligent in driving the apartment in the direction of the apartment in the vicinity of the Young Military, which was the front of the victim C(34 years old) driving in the direction of the apartment in the direction of the Go Young Military at the time.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence that caused injury to the victim E (the victim E (the 52-year old-age), who is the franchisor of the cargo vehicle, such as cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cages, etc. requiring approximately 6 weeks of medical treatment, the victim F (the 51-year-old) who is the same passenger, for approximately 2 weeks of medical treatment, and the brain cage cages, etc. requiring approximately 2 weeks of medical treatment to the victim G (the 2-year-old victim) who is the same passenger.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Special Cases concerning the Selection of Punishment for Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing reasons of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order include the fact that there is no criminal record of the defendant, the defendant's driver's vehicle is covered by comprehensive insurance, and the defendant has agreed with the victims, and the punishment is determined like the order.