logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2020.06.11 2018고단1627
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

The sentence against the accused shall be 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who, from May 2016 to September 17, 2018, installs six guest rooms and one bath room with the trade name of “C” from the first floor of the north-gu B at the port of distribution to “C” and operates a commercial sex business establishment.

No person shall arrange, recommend, induce or compel sexual traffic in return for promising to receive money, valuables or other property benefits from unspecified persons.

Nevertheless, on September 17, 2018, the Defendant requested the broker to mediate sexual traffic by having the broker engage in similar intercourse by receiving 100,000 won from one of the two police officers belonging to the police box of the police box of the Gyeongbuk Port Police Station, which was controlled by the above business establishment, and after taking the scambling female, taking the sexual organ of the customer into consideration. However, the Defendant failed to engage in sexual traffic and attempted to engage in sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (part);

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Each Defendant asserts to the effect that each Defendant did not engage in any act related to sexual traffic even though he was in a mixed operation of a marina shop, and that, on the date and time stated in the facts constituting an offense, each Defendant postponed phone calls from the wind to the wind, demanding the most similar act by two control police officers who visited customers and talking about the interview to seek sexual traffic women, and thus, this constitutes an impossible crime, since it constitutes an illegal naval investigation or against a control police officer who does not have a will to engage in sexual traffic.

However, the following circumstances, i.e., (1) the control police officer visited the Defendant’s operating business around September 17, 2018, under which two police officers, including the principal, pretended to be customers in this court, and (2) the police officers, including the principal, visited the Defendant.

Defendant

In the outside of the operating business place, there were two different signs of removal of goods that are ordinarily discovered in the business place providing similarity.

The defendant is two customers.

arrow