logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.08.21 2017고단1193
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with labor for one year, for one year, for Defendant B, for Defendant C, for one year and six months, and for Defendant D.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant’s Defendant is a person who, from May 31, 2015 to September 30, 2015, operated a sexual traffic business establishment under the trade name of “H” by leasing 318, 512, 524, and 602 rooms of Sejong-si Gtel from around March 31, 2015.

The defendant employed 2 to 4 women at the above business establishment, and received 150,000 won or 160,000 won from the non-lele customers, and let the above women do a sexual intercourse with the customers in the above 4 business establishment, or have them do the act of similarity with them, and acquired 50,000 won, which is a part of the price of sexual traffic received from the customers.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging sexual traffic.

2. Defendant C and Defendant B: (a) from October 1, 2015 to May 31, 2016, the Defendants: (b) leased the said Gtel 318, 512, 524, 602 4, 601, 614, and 726 7 rooms of the said Gtel 601, 614, and 726 to “H”; (c) the Defendants were to perform the overall operation of the business establishment from the interview of employees to the guidance of customers; (d) the Defendants were to perform the role of making reservations by obtaining a telephone from customers; and (e) Defendant C was to perform the role of managing the Defendant’s business establishment on behalf of the Defendant C and to make a public offering by dividing profits.

The Defendants employed 10,00 women, and received 150,000 or 160,000 won from the 10 customers, and let the above women do a sexual intercourse with the customers in the above 7 rooms, or have them do the act of similarity that they are employed by their descendants, and acquired 50,000 won, which is a part of the price of sexual traffic received by their customers.

As a result, Defendants conspired to act as commercial sex acts such as brokerage.

3. Defendants C, B, and A’s brokerage of sexual traffic are the said Gtel from June 1, 2016 to December 12, 2016.

arrow