beta
Text
Defendant
A and B Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, each of them shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and one year.
except that this judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On September 14, 2012, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Habitual Bribery) at the Seoul Central District Court on September 14, 2012, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Ansan Prison on March 8, 2014.
Defendant
B was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Central District Court on February 13, 2013, and on August 12, 2013, in addition to the completion of the enforcement of the sentence at the Seoul Central District Court on September 9, 2008, a fine of five million won was imposed on the same court on September 2, 2008, on October 20, 201, in the Seoul Southern District Court on the following grounds: (a) one year; (b) one year; (c) three million won of imprisonment with prison labor with prison labor with the Seoul Southern District Court on September 13, 201; and (d) three million won of fine with the same court on September 13, 2012 due to a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint conflict).
"Criminal Facts"
1. Defendant B: (a) using the fact that Defendant B did not report to customers any harm caused by the threat of crackdowns by related agencies, such as the police; (b) carried out a game by entering the illegal speculative game room; and (c) in the event of loss of money, he removed money by threatening business owners by borrowing a report of a tort.
On October 27, 2014, at around 02:00, the Defendant confirmed that the said entertainment room was operated unlawfully by entering the “JY” operated by the victim I in Daegu-gu H, Daegu-gu, and the game was altered, and that the said entertainment room was operated by the said entertainment room.
At around 06:00 on the same day, the Defendant appeared to have committed a report to the victim by stating that “The Defendant included KRW 1,80,000 in the game machine, but most lost, did not play a game, and made a report, such as going to return money.” The victim 60,000 won, and borrowed KRW 30,00 from A, “The victim 60,000 won and borrowed KRW 30,000 from A.,” which read to the effect that “the Defendant was f0,000 won and 50,000 won in the game machine.”