logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.06.04 2015고단2432
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(상습공갈)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On February 12, 2004, the Defendant was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon-do, and was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint conflict) at the Seoul Central District Court on February 4, 2009. On July 21, 201, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced the Defendant to one year of imprisonment for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint conflict) at the Seoul Southern District Court on July 21, 201, and completed the execution of the sentence on April 26, 201.

【Criminal Facts】

When the defendant makes a statement, such as "... to report" or " there is a problem in a game machine," etc. in the game room, the defendant thought that the business owner who is likely to interfere with the business will bring a small amount of cash into money and raise money using the circumstances that the business owner want to do so.

On September 4, 2014, the Defendant: (a) reported the completion of the construction at the EPC game room in the operation of the Victim D in Busan Metropolitan City, Busan Metropolitan Transportation C; (b) threatened the victim by the method of drinking as if he interfered with the business; (c) received KRW 50,00 won from the drinking victim; and (d) repied the victim by the same method from July 2013 to February 2015; and (c) habitually repied approximately KRW 1,064,00 in total in the 16 game room from July 2013 to February 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement of D, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, F, N,O, and P;

1. Each written statement of Q, R and S;

1. A description of each damage, records of the damage, records of the damage, and records of the damage;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Criminal records and investigation reports (verification of the same criminal records and the date of release);

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime, the frequency of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the fact that the same kind of crimes are repeated several times in a planned manner;

1. The relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the act of violence, etc.;

arrow