1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. Hegposi E 80 square meters, F 40 square meters, and above 40 square meters, and apap 7 square meters, and sap sap sap sap 16 square meters (hereinafter “the site and buildings before division”) were originally owned by G, the father of the Plaintiff.

B. G died on November 6, 1964 and died and became the co-inheritors, i.e., wife H and children, and the Plaintiff.

C. However, the I completed the registration of ownership transfer in the name of I on May 28, 1965, No. 19890, which was received on May 28, 1965, with respect to the land and building before subdivision by forging the documents related to the registration of ownership transfer in the name of G.

On March 18, 1969, K, as the husband of Defendant B and the father of Defendant C, purchased the land and the building before subdivision from Defendant C in KRW 360,000.

(2) On May 1, 1969, K completed the registration of ownership transfer (hereinafter “registration of ownership transfer”) as of May 1, 1969 for the site and building before subdivision on the ground of the instant sales contract, and K occupied the site and building before subdivision for not less than 20 years from that time.

E. On the other hand, E 80 square meters and F 40 square meters were merged into E 120 square meters on June 12, 1984, and divided into L 90 square meters and M 30 square meters on the same day, and the land divided as above was divided into L 77 square meters and L 67 square meters on November 11, 1985 (hereinafter the above L 77 square meters and 67 square meters on the following g) and N 21 square meters.

F. As to the instant land, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against K by asserting that the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of I as well as the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of K, which is based on the foregoing registration, was invalid, and that the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of K was void.

(B) The Plaintiff asserted in the Jeonju District Court 94Kadan26764 (hereinafter referred to as the “ Jeonju District Court”).

In other words, I's wife at the time of the instant sales contract is the hospital.