logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.01.10 2019고정2241
부정수표단속법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 18, 2002, the Defendant entered into a check contract with the E- which is located in the Gyeonggi-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E-si branch in the Gyeonggi-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, and issued a check.

On September 1, 2018, the Defendant issued a check number F, three million won in the check amount, and one copy of the above bank bank check in the name of the Defendant, which was issued on February 14, 2019, in the above C office, and presented a payment proposal to the Bank by the Bank on February 14, 2019, which was within the payment presentation period, but failed to pay three million won in the check amount due to the suspension of transaction.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each statute on a written accusation;

1. Article 36 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The part concerning the dismissal of prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (attached Form 1, 3, 4, 5, 6);

1. The summary of the facts charged is the operator of C, which is the store store located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City B, and around March 18, 2002, the Defendant entered into a check contract with the E-bank Si branch located in the Gyeonggi City under the name of the Defendant and issued a check.

On September 2018, the Defendant issued one copy of the above bank bank bank check in the name of the Defendant as of January 30, 2019 when the date of issuance of the check number H, three million won, and one copy of the bank check in the name of the Defendant as of January 30, 2019, which was within the payment presentation period, and decided that the check amount should not be paid due to the suspension of transaction. At that time, the Defendant issued five copies of the bank bank bank bank check in the attached Table Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6 and presented five copies of the bank bank bank check within the payment presentation period, but did not receive the total amount of KRW 15 million due to the suspension of transaction.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 2(2) of the Illegal Check Control Act.

arrow