The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On October 16, 2006, the Defendant entered into a contract with the Daejeon District Court of Daejeon, Daejeon, and entered into a check contract with the Daejeon District Court, which is located in 113 in the center of Daejeon, and traded household checks.

On December 2, 2013, the Defendant issued the check number “C”, face value “3,00,000,000,” issuance date “The Daejeon Bank Business Department of the Nonghyup Bank,” and the Defendant’s provisional coefficient of the said bank in the name of the Defendant, which was named as the “C”, “C”, “3,000,000,000,000,000,000.”

On April 30, 2014, the Defendant, on the date of presentment for payment, presented the check to the above bank, but did not receive it as a disposition of suspension of transaction.

From that time to March 2014, the Defendant issued five copies of the household check equivalent to 15,00,000 won in total as indicated below, and presented it within the period for presentment of payment, each holder was paid as suspension of payment, and the amount of the check number on the check No. 3,00,000 won on the date of payment on the check No. 1283, Dec. 30, 2013; 3,000,000 won on April 30, 2014; 4,00 won on April 30, 200,00 won on April 30, 2014; 3,000 won on April 30, 2014; 30,000 won on April 30, 2014; 30,000 won on April 30, 2013 E,00,000 won on April 30, 2014.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are the crimes falling under Article 2(2) and (1) of the Illegal Check Control Act, which fall under Article 2(4) of the same Act and against the explicit intent of the check holder even if the check holder failed to recover or collect the check, and the facts charged in the instant case can be acknowledged that the Defendant, who was the check holder Nos. 1 through 4 check holders, and the check holder Nos. H and 5 check holders, after the prosecution in the instant case, expressed his intention not to prosecute. Thus, the prosecution in the instant case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6)