logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.05.04 2016고단571
경범죄처벌법위반
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won, and a fine of 3,00,000 won, respectively.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 22, 2016, Defendant A, at a D hotel located in Ulsan-gu, Namsan-gu, a new wall, appealed from the fact that Defendant A was arrested as a current offender in the injury case to the police officer G belonging to the F District of the F District Police Station in Ulsan-do, Ulsan-do, the Defendant raised a complaint to the police officer G who was arrested as a current offender in the injury case, and according to the above police officer and E, the F District located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu.

After that, the defendant, at around 04:25 on the same day, had been under the influence of alcohol, and had been punished by a fine of 50,000 won as the cancellation column of the state of the government office.

In order to avoid a disturbance of about 20 minutes by putting about 10 minutes into a riotous speech and behavior at a public office, such as opening, killing, killing, and shotling, and taking a bath, etc., a government office carried out spirits or slicking by very rough words and actions.

2. 피고인 B 피고 인은 위 1. 항과 같은 날 04:37 경 같은 F 지구대에서, 위 F 지구대 소속 경찰관 J 및 경찰관 K 등이 위와 같은 이유로 피고 인의 일행인 A을 현행 범인으로 체포하려 하자, 위 J과 K에게 “ 야, 미친 새끼들 아, 짭새 새끼들이 뭐하는 짓이냐

The clothes of the above J, etc., are boomed with the clothes of the above J, etc., and as a result, the above K’s chest part and the parts of the above J’s Hebbbbbbbbbs were walking several times, thereby hindering the above J and K’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each police statement to J or K;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts;

(a) Defendant A: Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act;

B. Defendant B: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the commercial concurrence (Defendant B);

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (limited to sentencing) of the Criminal Act (limited to sentencing) of each of the Defendants’ detention in a workhouse, as well as various circumstances, such as the age, circumstances leading to the commission of a crime, and degree of reflectivity as shown in the records and arguments.

arrow