logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1984. 7. 24. 선고 84도1144 판결
[특정가중처벌등에관한법률위반ㆍ도로교통법위반][집32(3)형,860;공1984.9.15.(736),1467]
Main Issues

Whether a driver who has left the scene where the accident is about to be known to his/her parents after the accident (affirmative)

Summary of Judgment

A driver is obligated to immediately stop a person while driving and take necessary measures, such as providing assistance to casualties, so long as he/she leaves the scene of the accident without taking such measures, he/she shall not be exempted from the responsibility of violating measures, such as relief, etc., even though he/she left the scene of the accident where he/she intends to inform his/her parents of the occurrence of the accident and take follow-up measures.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 45 (1) of the Road Traffic Act

Escopics

Defendant

upper and high-ranking persons

Defendant

Defense Counsel

Attorney Dog-gu

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 84No461 delivered on April 20, 1984

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The number of detention days after an appeal shall be included in the calculation of the original sentence.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal by the defendant and the public defender are also examined.

According to the evidence cited by the court below, the defendant, while driving a truck without the driver's license as at the time of original judgment, had the victim shocked due to the negligence of the driver's negligence, and had the victim escape without taking necessary measures, such as aiding and abetting the bodily injury, etc., and the fact that the above victim caused the death at the site is sufficiently recognized and there is no error in the process of evidence preparation.

The issue is that the defendant does not escape from the scene of the accident that he/she intends to inform his/her parents of the occurrence of the accident and take follow-up measures. However, according to the Road Traffic Act Article 45 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the driver is obligated to immediately stop and take necessary measures such as providing assistance to casualties when he/she killed or injured a person during driving, so it is unreasonable to be exempted from the charge of violating measures such as providing relief, etc. unless he/she leaves the scene of the accident without taking

Therefore, the appeal shall be dismissed, and 40 days of detention days after the appeal shall be included in the original sentence. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating judges.

Justices Lee Lee Sung-soo (Presiding Justice)

arrow
심급 사건
-서울고등법원 1984.4.20.선고 84노461