1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to pay below shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. The court's explanation of this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for any dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, the court's explanation of this case is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[C] The "attached Form of Calculation of Damages" is added to the "attached Form of Calculation of Damages" in this judgment.

The third party’s “(based on recognition)” means “The results and results of the fact-finding with respect to the F Hospital Head of this Court” as “the results of the physical examination of the F Hospital Head of this Court” and “The results of the physical examination of the F Hospital Head of the Party” and “The evidence A No. 12, 14, and B No. 2” are added.

Part 4-5(A) and part 8(b)(3) are as follows: 3) 9.5% of the loss of labor ability (e.g., up to 4-5(s) up to 2-6(s) and 10.5% of the injury of beer 2-D-2-a, occupational coefficient 8, 10% of the injury of beer 8, 19% x (1 - 0.5) x 19%) and permanent disability (from 20.6 to 1.6.6% of the injury of beer 2: 20.6 to 25.6% of the total injury of beer 2.6 to 15.6% of the injury of beer 2.6). However, the first instance court determined that the Plaintiff was 1.6% of the total injury of beer 10 to 25.6% of the injury of beer 20.6% of the average injury of beer 1.6% of 20 to 25.6.6% of the death of 20.6.6.1.6.6.6.6.6.

However, this shall not apply.