1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the following additional payment order shall be revoked.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is that the plaintiff's assertion of the increase in consolation money is insufficient to recognize the plaintiff's assertion of the increase in consolation money, and each statement of evidence No. 21 to No. 23 is excluded, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the use of or addition to certain matters as follows. Thus,

The attached damages calculation table of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be replaced by the attached damages calculation table of the judgment of the court of first instance.

According to the results of physical entrustment to the head of the relevant university hospital of the first instance, the part "3) disability and labor capacity loss rate of 14th grade or lower shall be as follows." 3) Aftermath disability and labor capacity loss rate of 3, 5, and 24, and the head of the relevant university hospital of the first instance, the Plaintiff suffered injuries, such as complex cutting of the right edge and the closure of the right edge, etc. due to the instant accident, and entered 10.5th grade or lower of the 20th grade or lower of the 15th grade or lower of the 14th grade or lower of the 20th grade or lower of the 10th grade or lower of the 15th grade or lower of the 20th grade or lower of the 10th grade or lower of the 15th grade or lower of the 10th grade or lower of the 10th grade or lower of the 20th grade or lower of the 15th grade or lower of the 10th grade or lower of the 20th grade of the 19th grade or lower of the 20th grade of the Plaintiff’s.