logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.09.12 2017구합53710
징계처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff was appointed as a policeman on April 3, 199, and was promoted to a slope on April 1, 2012. From January 28, 2016, the Plaintiff served in the Gyeongnam Police Agency Kim Jong-dong Police Agency B district unit.

B. On November 28, 2016, C, as a new female police officer, was assigned to B as a trainee in B, and the Plaintiff was designated as C’s mentor and served as C with C during that time.

C. Meanwhile, around April 10, 2017, at the Kim Dong-dong Police Station held a sexual harassment conference on or around 10:00, and C, after attending the above conference, provided the Plaintiff with counseling on sexual harassment to the police officers in the same police station, and then, at around 18:20 on the same day, knew of the Plaintiff’s sexual harassment to the auditor in the hearing and auditor in the relevant police station on or around the same day.

C On May 1, 2017 and May 4, 2017, the office of the auditor of the office of the office of the office of the auditor of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the senior secretary of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the senior secretary of the office of the office of the office of the office of the senior secretary of the office of the office of the office

(C) On May 8, 2017, it was transferred to the D Department of the Deputy Police Station (C). (e)

In addition, on May 24, 2017, the chief of the police station rendered a disposition of one month of salary reduction pursuant to Article 78(1) of the State Public Officials Act (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the grounds that the Plaintiff’s sexual harassment against C (hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”) constituted a violation of the duty of good faith, duty of obey, and duty to maintain dignity under the State Public Officials Act.

① On April 18, 2017, at around 22:00 - 23:00, the Plaintiff considered C as “Innnnn dyn dyn hyn hyn hyn hyn hyn hyn hyn hyn hyn hyn hyn hyn hyn hyn hyn hyn hyn hyn hyn hyn hyn hyn

② On April 19, 2017, the Plaintiff is inside the patrol vehicle while serving as a hub before the E elementary school in Kimhae-si around 08:30.

arrow