logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.01.29 2015고단4612
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 7, 2015, at around 01:40, the Defendant: (a) reported at the house of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government apartment house C, and located in D, 405; (b) reported at 112 that he would not sleep by drinking alcohol; and (c) recommended the Defendant to have the Defendant returned home by the police officer affiliated with the Seoul Young-gu Police Station E District Unit of the Seoul Young-gu Police Station, Seoul, Young-gu, Seoul, to have the F go home; and (b) f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of victimized police officers;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for a crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a group, deadly weapon, etc.) and the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for a crime of damage to property during the suspended sentence, but the defendant was sentenced again to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for a crime of this case without being subject to the suspended sentence of imprisonment for

However, the punishment shall be imposed by a fine only once in consideration of various sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc., although the degree of interference with the execution of official duties is not serious, it seems that the crime in this case is committed by contingency under the influence of alcohol.

arrow