Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

around 04:11 on May 9, 201, the Defendant: (a) taken a bath to E, the owner of the foregoing drinking house, who performed alcoholic beverages, without any justifiable reason; (b) taken the floor of his hand to the said E, 2-3 scamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscams

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports by the above G 112 who is a police official in the performance of duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each police statement protocol to E and G;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not good enough to obstruct the performance of official duties by assaulting a police officer in the state of detention, the defendant is punished by a fine in consideration of the following factors: (a) the degree of assault committed by a police officer was not significant; (b) there was no record of committing the same kind of crime; and (c) there was no record of criminal punishment for the last ten years; (d) the defendant deposited KRW 300,00 for the police officer in order to deposit KRW 30,00 for the police officer; and (e) the defendant seriously reflects his/her mistake; and (e) the defendant is punished by a fine in consideration of all the sentencing conditions shown in arguments, such as the defendant's age