Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On August 3, 2018, the Defendant visited his parent's residence on the B2th floor of Suwon-gu, Busan Metropolitan City by taking advantage of the leave around 09:50 on August 3, 2018, and was on the 112 report due to domestic violence during the process of drinking, and was under restraint from C District D, B, and Police Officers, and was separated from his family members, and was isolated from the fluence.

이에 피고인은 고함을 지르고 욕설을 하며 집 안으로 들어가려고 하여 순경 F로부터 제지를 받자 “ 개새끼야” 라는 등의 욕설을 하며 손으로 순경 F의 머리채를 잡아 아래로 끌어내리고, 계속하여 난간이 없는 2 층에서 고성을 지르고 난동을 부려 위 F가 안전을 위해 수갑을 채우자 “ 뭘 꼴 아보나 씨 발 새끼야 쫄았냐

쫄았네

The phrase “F’s body was tightly pushed off on several occasions,” and the matho used “F’s right knee,” and the matho used the F’s right knee-knee-knee-knee-kne.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the F and G police statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of assault damage;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 of the same Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act, committed an assault against a police officer who conducts domestic violence suppression and investigation, thereby undermining public authority with regard to the enforcement of the Act.

On the second floor where it is easy for the Defendant to fall off, the Defendant would have been able to face the victim with the victim, and the victim will be knee and knee with his body, etc., and the degree of the type of force seems to be less and more likely to have been less at risk.

Although the defendant was sentenced to a fine of 2010 due to the crime of injury, he again committed the crime of this case. However, the defendant is contingent.