1. All appeals filed by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are borne by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

1. The reasons why the court of this case is to use for this case are as follows: (a) according to the above facts of recognition, i.e., Section 3 of the first instance judgment, i.e., “the instant motor vehicle is presumed to be owned by the Plaintiff, who is a registered titleholder,” and (b) pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the addition of “the instant

(2) The defendant's counterclaim is justified in the judgment of the court of first instance, while the defendant repeats the same arguments in the judgment of the court of first instance, even if the defendant's arguments and grounds for partial supplementation are considered in the court of first instance, the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable). 2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of the principal lawsuit is accepted in the grounds, and the defendant's counterclaim is dismissed due to the lack of reasons. The judgment of the court of first instance