logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.05.22 2017가합561525
정산금 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's lawsuit against the defendant C is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant B corporation.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant C Co., Ltd. (the trade name prior to the alteration is Co., Ltd.; hereinafter “Defendant C”) promoted “D sales business” (hereinafter “D business”) from G buildings located in the area of 10 lots, F in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and 10 lots, G buildings ( underground 4 floors and 5 floors above the ground).

For the above business, the defendant C was at the time of each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 among the above buildings, and paragraphs (1) and (2) of the attached Table No. 1, and (3) of the attached Table No. 1, but on November 7, 2012, Pho Lake (1170.48mm2) was divided from Mhoho (1825.51m2) and all of the real estate was divided into four.

(hereinafter the same shall apply)

(hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant real estate” as security and appointment of the Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation as a trustee in bankruptcy on September 6, 2012, as follows: (a) H (the trade name before the change was made is a corporation I; hereinafter “H”) was declared bankrupt on September 6, 2012.

The real estate disposal trust agreement with Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) regarding each of the instant real estate was concluded in order to obtain a loan from the business fund and to repay the loan.

B. As part of the aforementioned D business, the Plaintiff et al. acquired shares in each of the instant real estate by acquiring shares in the Plaintiff et al., and the owners of shares and shares in each of the instant real estate are different by each of the real estate owners and shares in the relationship with the above J, K, Q, Plaintiff, R, S, and his/her employees and business partners, including the Plaintiff, or in the relationship with C’s employees and business partners (hereinafter referred to as “seven persons including the Plaintiff et al.”), around June 22, 2004.

Although the registration of transfer of each of the instant real estate in this case was completed with the joint ownership of the plaintiff et al., seven persons such as the plaintiff et al., seven persons such as the plaintiff et al., the trust contract date, the trust contract date, the trust registration date, and the trust registration date.

arrow