Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On April 1, 2018, the Defendant: (a) organized the slopeD belonging to the District Party C District of the Branch of the Police Station, which was called out after receiving a report on noise-related 112, from the 506th floor prior to Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si; and (b) organized these circumstances; and (c) tried to return to the District; and (d) completed a defect to return to the District “dyer’s house for more than one hour”
In claiming that “,” the police officers prevented the police officers from proceeding with approximately 10 minutes of patrol by entering the back wheel of the defective patrol vehicle and obstructing the police officers from proceeding on the patrol vehicle.
Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases and the maintenance of order.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police against D;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (fadicule of the video recording of the campaign), investigation report (report on the confirmation of video CDs);
1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;
1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;
1. The following circumstances are the circumstances that are disadvantageous to the Defendant, such as: (a) the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution is to prevent the patrol from proceeding between about 10 minutes by entering the back wheels of the patrol; and (b) the specific attitude is considerably defective.
However, there is no record of punishment exceeding the same criminal record and fine, confession and reflect on the crime in this case, and other factors such as the situation of Article 51 of the Criminal Act, the scope of recommended punishment according to sentencing guidelines, etc. shall be determined like the order.