The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Although the Defendant appealed on the ground that the lower court’s punishment (one year of imprisonment) was too unreasonable, the Defendant appealed on the ground that the Defendant committed the instant crime of obstruction of performance of official duties at the place of the instant crime operated by the Victim F, even though the said victim asked the police officer to protect the said victim and asked the said victim to speak that he would not find the said victim, the Defendant committed the instant crime of injury against the said victim again at the same place. As such, even if the police investigation was conducted in the same place, the Defendant committed the instant crime of causing damage to the property and the destruction of the structure of the instant case, including the fact that the nature of the crime is not very good, there were multiple criminal records including the fact that the Defendant was punished with a sentence, and there were several criminal records including the fact that the Defendant had the history of punishment for obstruction of performance of official duties twice due to the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, it is not recognized that the Defendant’s punishment imposed by the lower court is too unjust on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

Since the appeal by the defendant is groundless, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.