The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court (one year of imprisonment) against the accused against the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. Determination Doctrine, Defendant’s depth reflects on each of the instant charges, and both of the instant charges are recognized from the investigation agency to the trial of the party. It is recognized that the victim of traffic accident C and the prosecution had been smoothly agreed, and that there was no history of punishment by imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment.

However, since 2009, the Defendant had been punished three times as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, and committed each of the crimes of this case without being aware of it during the suspended execution period due to the crime of causing death or injury to dangerous driving. In the case of a false accusation, it is not good that H has caused waste of national judicial function by filing a false report to the police with the knowledge that H did not have stolen the money of the Defendant.

Considering such circumstances and all the circumstances as the age, character and conduct, living environment, etc. of the Defendant, the lower court’s sentence against the Defendant is appropriate and too unreasonable.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition