beta
Text
Defendant
C Imprisonment for four months, each of the defendants A and B shall be punished by a fine of one thousand won.
Defendant
A and B shall be subject to the said fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant C’s sole criminal conduct
A. On July 12, 2010, the Defendant interfered with the business from around 15:00 to 19:00 on July 12, 2010, the Defendant: (a) invested the said G with the said G to purchase pine trees; and (b) planted it to the said farmer; (c) purchased the pine trees on the ground that G independently disposed of it; (d) on the ground that the victim I purchased pine trees from the said G purchased the said G, extracted the pine trees from using equipment and human parts to remove them, and thereby interfered with the victim’s business by force by force by preventing the passage of the street car car car, cream and freight cars.
B. On July 13, 2010, the Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant, from around 08:00 on July 13, 2010 to around 18:00 on the same day, obstructed the victim’s duties by force by preventing the victim from shipping out pine trees by refacing the said farmer’s access route to a car for the same reason in the place indicated in the preceding paragraph, for the same reason.
C. From around 09:00 on July 27, 2010 to around 31, 2010, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s business by force by preventing the victim from extracting pine trees by expectationing pine trees on the same ground at the places indicated in the preceding paragraph, or by preventing creamleleers from spreading, and by preventing the victim from removing pine trees by getting off the said pine trees by getting off the said pine trees by getting off the said KRW clurging the said KRW 30 to a car.
2. The Defendants’ co-principal Defendants, on the same grounds as the places described in the preceding paragraph from August 1, 2010 to December 2, 2010, prevented Defendant C from blocking or entering the bottom of sckes and freight cars, and Defendant B was a car with LA-to-purds, Defendant A prevented the victim from shipping out of the scurine with Msch Rexroths by preventing the victim from shipping out of the scurf., thereby obstructing the victim’s duties by force.
Summary of Evidence
1. Part of the Defendants’ respective records of the second trial.