beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000, and by a fine of KRW 500,000.
The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The co-principal defendant A is a person who operates a business leasing the factory building and site under the trade name of "D Co., Ltd.", and the defendant B works for the head of the management department in the same company.
A victim E (the age of 43) leased the site of a factory from Defendant A to operate the factory in F with the trade name of “F”, and the victim G (the age of 50) was in office in the establishment of a trade name of “H” and in office in the former office of the revocation company, and was in office in the process of dismantling and removal of the above F factory operated by the victim E at the request of the victim E.
The Defendants had the mind to interfere with the dissolution and transfer of the above list on the grounds that victims E, the owner of the above factory, did not pay the above KRW 7.2 million rental fee during the process of moving the factory.
Defendant
B around 15:00 on December 12, 2012, around 15:00, from the foregoing F regularly located in Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City I, the victims should not be removed from the list that the victims terminated by preventing the entry of the F into the JNsc-gu Pc-c-in, and the Defendant A appeared in the above place at around 16:00 on the same day. As above, Defendant B was viewed as preventing the entry into the above vehicle by means other than “I will bring about a lot of rash and massc-in. I will bring about a death.” After receiving a report from the police, the Defendants prevented the entry into the above list by preventing the continuous entry into the vehicle by the above method from being carried out from 2:00 on the same day.
Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with each other on December 12, 2012, and thereby interfered with the victims' dissolution and removal of the list from around 16:00 to about 2:00 on the same day by force for about six hours.
2. Defendant B’s sole criminal conduct, from December 23, 2012 to November 11:00 of the same month, the victim E with the K typ typ vehicle from the above F’s due diligence from around December 23, 2012, and JN chip vehicle from around December 13, 200.