Plaintiff (Attorney Woo-hee et al., Counsel for plaintiff-appellant)

The Government Employees Pension Service

October 31, 2017

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2016Guhap83020 decided July 21, 2017

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. On July 1, 2016, the Defendant revoked the disposition of the payment of the divided pension site to the Plaintiff.

1. Quotation of the first instance judgment

The court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s assertion, even if the evidence submitted by the court of first instance and the court of first instance are re-examineed, is recognized as legitimate.

Therefore, the court's explanation on the instant case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is citing it by Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Landscaping Co., Ltd. (Presiding Judge)