logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.03.14 2017고정328
폐기물관리법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who exercises overall control over the duties of in-house directors of in-house corporation B located in Chungcheong Budget Group C, and Defendant B is a corporation established to produce industrial machinery, etc. due to in-house work.

1. A person discharging industrial wastes shall dispose of wastes directly generated from his/her place of business, or entrust the disposal to a person who has obtained permission for his/her waste disposal business, a reporter of waste disposal, or a person who installs and operates

Nevertheless, at around March 31, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 31, 2012, the Defendant: (b) was a company located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun; (c) the fact was disposed of by means of reclaiming chemical substance 23,830 km to (oil) Da, which is located in the Seoul-nam Budget Co., Ltd.; and (d) the chemical substance ever discharged from the State; and (e) the chemical substance ever discharged from the public law after using the light chemical agents; and (e) the chemical substance ever discharged from the public law; and (e) the Defendant was permitted to dispose of the substance ever out of the store ever, and (e) the waste collection and transportation company did not dispose of the substance ever.

From that time until September 10, 2015, the Defendant, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Form, processed them into approximately 1,861,770 kg of the chemical shop located in approximately 84 times in total, without obtaining permission to dispose of the chemical shop located in the same manner (such as the list of crimes).

2. Defendant B, a corporation, had A commit an act of violation as described in paragraph 1 at the time and place mentioned in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Investigation report (State) (Reporting on the confirmation of the nature of the master who has closed B);

1. Application of a certificate of report on the person discharging industrial wastes, a detailed statement of purchase by each company (the details of receipts and specifications of purchase), a three-party contract for the entrusted disposal of wastes, a comprehensive recycling business license, and a written confirmation of entrusted disposal capacity;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: The former Waste Management Act (amended by Act No. 13411, Jul. 20, 2015) (amended by Act No. 13411, Jul. 2016).

arrow