Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who operates B-si.
1. On February 24, 2017, around 23:00, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim C, and continued to keep the victim’s thought, without following necessary procedures such as returning it to the victim, even though the victim C acquired one of Samsung Ggal jus in an amount equivalent to KRW 1100,00,000 at the market price of the victim’s ownership, which was placed before the Busan Maritime Transportation Daegu D apartment.
2. On April 11, 2017, around 02:30 on the part of the Defendant committed the crime against the Victim E, the Defendant continued to keep the victim’s thought to have had, without following necessary procedures such as returning the fact, even though the Victim E acquired one Samsung Gallon equivalent to KRW 800,000,000 in the market value of the victim’s ownership, which was left by the Victim E after boarding the said cab in front of the G GF located in Busan Shipping Daegu, Busan.
3. On April 13, 2017, around 01:00, the Defendant continued to keep as the victim’s thought without following necessary procedures, such as returning it to the victim, even though he/she found one sample 1,00,000, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 9.50,000,000, the victim’s market price of which was 400,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.
Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that was separated from the possession of the above victims for three times.
Summary of Evidence
1. The legal statement of K Witness;
1. Application of each statute on police statements made to I, E, and C;
1. Relevant Article 360 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 360 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;