logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.04.29 2015고단2198
절도등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 31, 2015, the Defendant: (a) on August 31, 2015, up to 12:00, the Defendant: (b) acquired the 900,000 won of the market value of the victim B’s possession in the Nam-gu Newdong-dong, Nam-gu, Chungcheongnam-si; and (c) obtained the 6 dud smartphone 1,000,000 of the market value of the Plaintiff’s possession; (b) but (c) did not take necessary procedures, such as returning the acquired property to the victim; and (d) did

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.

2. A thief, Sept. 5, 2015, at around 20:0, the Defendant: (a) posted cash 40,000 won at a gallon 4 smartphone, one resident registration certificate, two credit cards, etc. attached to the Australia, where the victim C, who was under influence of alcohol, was placed immediately adjacent to the victim C, who was under influence of alcohol, and was placed adjacent to the gallon 700,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to C and B;

1. Character messages;

1. Each smartphone photograph;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Articles 329 and 360 (1) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of embezzlement of deserted articles in possession), and selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order: (b) the Defendant was committed by committing a crime; (c) the injury was returned to the victims; and (d) the victims did not want the Defendant’s punishment;

arrow