logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.11.21 2013나8164
채무부존재확인
Text

1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. At around 20:40 on December 7, 201, the Plaintiff driven on the front road of Gwangju Northern-gu C at around 20:40.

Reasons

1. In fact, around 20:40 on December 7, 201, there was an accident of collision between the Plaintiff’s Dworkunama car (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s vehicle”) seeking to turn to the left at the right-side of the new Tri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri (hereinafter “Defendant’s vehicle”) and the Defendant’s E ESM car (hereinafter “Defendant’s vehicle”) seeking to turn to the left at the right-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri

The above three-distance intersection is an intersection in the form of "a bend" (hereinafter referred to as "the instant intersection") at the right side when viewed from the plaintiff's running direction, and the specific form is as follows:

The Defendant received medical treatment due to the instant accident by suffering from injuries, such as salt pane, tension, tension, and tensions, etc., of the verteum, and the Plaintiff also received medical treatment due to the dume and tensions of the bones, frye of the chest, damage of head, etc.

The intersection of this case is at the intersection between the three-lanes of the length of the defendant vehicle (hereinafter referred to as the “road”) and the one-lanes of the plaintiff vehicle running in the direction of the vehicle (hereinafter referred to as the “subsection”). In the case of the defendant running direction, the central line is installed by the display of the safety zone, and the left turn and the U-turn are prohibited from the left turn in the direction of the Yong-dong river.

At the time of the instant accident, many vehicles were parked on both sides of the direction of the Plaintiff’s vehicle driving.

G. 1. The direction of the progress of the Plaintiff’s vehicle: 1. The fact that there is no dispute over 12m [based on recognition] of the 0.0m (1, 2, 3-1 through 9, 1-1, 2, 3, 6-1, 7-2, 7-1, 7, 7-2, and 12m (1, 2, 2, 3-1 through 6 of the evidence No. 1-1, 3, 5-2, and the purport of the entire pleadings in the shape of the f.

2. The parties' assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the accident of this case is unlawful.

arrow