logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.04.17 2014고단1596
위계공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant forged a Korean Driver’s License, and sentenced him to exchange and use it as a Korean Driver’s License.

1. Around September 2006, the Defendant: (a) asked the friendly D, who is located in the Philippines at the residence of Pakistan Co. 419 206 Dong-si, Pakistan-si; and (b) requested to forge and request the Switzerland driver’s license by putting a phone on the phone; and (c) by putting a forged identification card.

At that time, the above D requested the Defendant to forge his driver's license by questioning his identification card forgery so that his name can not be known at a place where the place of the Philippines could not be known.

After that, on December 2006, the name of the Republic of Korea was written in a plastic with a size similar to that of the Republic of Korea's driver's license in a place where it is impossible to identify the place of the Republic of Korea's identification card forgery, whose name is unknown, such as the Defendant's personal information (A, BITRHDDE: E, SEX: M and LICNES NF) in the name of the State of Land Transport of the Philippines.

As a result, the Defendant, in collusion with the above identification card forgeryyer, forged one copy of the Philippines driver's license, which is a private document under the name of the land transportation country of the Philippines without any authority for the purpose of uttering.

2. On February 23, 2007, the Defendant filed an application for the issuance of a driver’s license with a father-car driver’s license in Mapo-dong 438, Mapo-gu, Seoul, for the issuance of a falsified driver’s license with a public official who is not aware of the forgery and exercised the same.

3. On February 23, 2007, the Defendant filed an application for the issuance of a driver’s license with a deceptive scheme, and filed a false confirmation, etc. with a public official who is not able to know the name of the deputy driver’s license in the above Western driver’s license test site, and received a domestic driver’s license around that time.

By doing so, the defendant is the letter of the driver's license test by fraudulent means.

arrow