Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

No one may intermediate a third party's communications through telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator under the Telecommunications Business Act, or provide such services for communications of a third party.

Nevertheless, on June 22, 2017, the Defendant received KRW 20,000 per unit on condition that he/she opened a cell phone in the city of Do Government with B and the prepaid cell phone, and sent the Defendant’s resident registration certificate to B’s cell phone, and prepared a written confirmation of the opening of the prepaid cell phone in the name of the Defendant, and provided the Defendant with telecommunications services, such as C (D), E (F), G (F), H (I), J (I (I), K (L), M (N (N), Q (P (P), Q (P (P, July 19, 2017), R (S, and July 19, 2017), T (N, Jul. 19, 2017), U. 19, U.S., and V. 2017, respectively, by providing each telecommunications business operator with telecommunications services.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Data on the opening status of prepaid mobile phones, etc.;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (Attachment of results of execution of a warrant of seizure);

1. Article 97 of the relevant Act and Article 97 subparagraph 7 of the Telecommunications Business Act and the main sentence Article 30 of the same Act concerning the selection of criminal facts, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is deemed to have been provided to others by opening the so-called largephones with the Defendant being paid the price and having up to 12 persons in total, and the liability for the crime is not less complicated in light of the method, circumstance, and content of the crime.

However, it is advantageous to the fact that the defendant recognizes all the charges of this case and reflects the defendant's mistake in depth, and that the defendant has no criminal record for the same crime and has no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine.