logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2020.09.23 2020고단3247
전기통신사업법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one may intermediate a third party's communications using telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator or provide such services for a third party's communications.

Nevertheless, around December 2, 2019, the Defendant: (a) sent the Defendant’s resident registration certificate, the Defendant’s photograph, the Defendant’s photograph, the Defendant’s opening application, and a written pledge not to be terminated within three months, to a person whose name is not known, via the C website, via the C website, to use the mobile oil (credit number: F) in a non-face, and then received KRW 15,000 from a person whose name was unknown, who sent the Defendant’s resident registration certificate, the Defendant’s photograph, the Defendant’s photograph, the Defendant’s opening application, and the Defendant’s promise not to be terminated within 14:00 on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant provided telecommunications services provided by telecommunications business operators for another's communications.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a request for the provision of data on internal investigation (at least 32 special communication companies with F and the details of G replies), requests for the provision of data on communications, and requests for the provision of data on communications;

1. Relevant Article of facts constituting an offense, and subparagraph 7 of Article 97 of the Telecommunications Business Act and the main sentence of Article 30 of the same Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is deemed to have received compensation from the Defendant and let another person use it, and since it can be abused for other crimes such as singinging, etc., it is necessary to strictly punish such crimes. In light of the above, the crime and the nature of the crime are not weak.

The defendant's mistake is recognized and is punished for the same crime.

arrow