logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2016.04.15 2015고정756
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Since 200, the Defendant had been engaged in money transactions with the complainant since 200 when the complainant had been the owner of the house.

On June 2009, the Defendant stated that “I wish to lend another person’s money to the complainant at the office of the complainant at the racing-si, the Defendant, “I inform the complainant of the head of the Tong and the password to receive interest on the loan of this money.”

Therefore, the complainant informed the agricultural cooperative head of the Tong and the seal for the collection of the defendant to the finite and password.

1. On June 26, 2009, the Defendant: (a) stated that “D”, “D”, “E”, and “E” in the deposit note in the column of the account using a stample in the form in which it was found at the seat of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries located in the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (FFF) of the racing; and (b) stated “E” in the form in which it was placed in front of the name of E.

E’s seal has been affixed.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged the search for the 22 occasions from around that time to December 2, 2010 in the name of E, a private document pertaining to rights and obligations, such as the list of crimes in attached Form 22.

2. In the event of the above investigation document, the Defendant: (a) sent the forged list to an employee who could not know the name of the branch office of the NAF, the NAF, who was aware of the forgery; and (b) exercised the forged list as shown in the annexed list of crimes, as if it was duly formed.

3. The Defendant, at the same time and time as above, discovered forged and lost (e.g., pre-collection slips) and presented the passbook of the complainants, and had legitimate authority to withdraw deposits from the passbook’s deposit account, deceiving the employees of the branch office of the NAF branch of the NAF as if he had legitimate authority to do so.

The defendant shall receive 70,000 won in cash, which is owned by the branch of the Dong branch of the Agricultural Cooperative, from the employees of the Dong branch of the Agricultural Cooperative, the defendant, who was so deceiving, as a deposit withdrawal.

arrow