logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2017.08.23 2017고단1295
농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and a fine of twenty million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaged in the livestock product sales business under the trade name, title, “D” in the Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu, under the name, “F,” and “D” as an employee.

1. From the beginning of November 2014 to February 28, 2017, the Defendant: (a) sold or had employees sell 747 km, such as lives of foreign beef cattle, such as 10,197kg, purchased from “D”; (b) the Defendant sold or had employees sell 747 km, such as lives of foreign swine, such as lives purchased from “I”; and (c) the Defendant sold or had employees sell 10,197 gg of foreign beef, such as lives of foreign pigs purchased from “I”; and (d) the Defendant sold or made employees sell 747 ggg of the said foreign swine, such as lives of Korean swine, kept in the air conditioning room, such foreign pigs, such as lives of Korean swine, which were put in custody in the air conditioning room, to the employees of G.

Accordingly, in collusion with the above G, the Defendant made a false indication of the origin of agricultural and fishery products or made an indication that is likely to cause confusion, and sold agricultural and fishery products in a disguised manner.

2. Crimes in F;

A. On December 16, 2016, from around February 28, 2017 to around February 28, 2017, the Defendant sold the country of origin, indicating the country of origin as “domestic products and Australia,” and indicating the 254km of Australia beef purchased from the said “I” as “domestic products and Australia,” as shown in attached Table 3.

B. On February 28, 2017, the Defendant indicated the origin as “domestic origin and Spanish acid” and sold it after marking the “Spanish acid,” as shown in attached Table 4 Spanish Nos. 4 attached hereto, which was purchased from the said “F” around February 28, 2017.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an act of falsely indicating the origin of agricultural and fishery products or making an indication that is likely to cause confusion.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's person;

arrow