Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the defendants are above one year from the date when this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and Defendant B are marital relations.

1. Defendant A

A. On November 10, 2017, the Defendant, at the main point of “D” located in Sanyang-gu, Sanyang-si, Sanyang-si, Sanyang-si, where he had observed that he drinks together with males on other tables, and caused damage to the Defendant, where he was found to have a beer’s disease on one’s table, who was on one’s own tables, and was frighted with 200,000 won at one’s market price.

B. On November 10, 2017, around 22:35, the Defendant: (a) was arrested the Defendant at the place indicated in No. 1-A; and (b) was sent out upon receipt of a report; and (c) the circumstances belonging to the G District of the police station G District of the G District of the police station of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea

1. The tax base of taxable year shall be the tax base of taxable year.

Chewing police officers must do so.

“In doing so, assaulted by hand such as putting the body of the above H with his hand and tightly pushing ahead.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of police officers in flagrant offenders.

2. On November 10, 2017, at around 22:35, the Defendant assaulted A, his husband, at the place indicated in paragraph 1-A, at one time, at the time, and committed assault, such as: (a) in order to be informed of the reason why he assaulted the husband of the said I from the security guards of the police station G District located in the said Ansan Manyang Mann Mann Mann Mann Mann, and (b) in order to be informed of the said I, the Defendant committed assaulting the said H, such as: (b) he was able to fright the left side of the said H; (c) she walked knee in drinking; and (d) she was frighting the H’s chest to drinking by drinking.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning police officers' dispatch of reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Application of statutes on police statements made to H and F;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts;

A. Defendant A: Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of damage to property) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties).