A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 04:00 on June 3, 2017, the Defendant insultingd the victim by openly insulting the victim by stating that, while the Defendant, in front of the F District E in Ansan-gu, the taxi engineer G and the sprink, accompanied by the taxi payment problem, the Defendant discovered the taxi driver G and the sprink belonging to the F District in the police station, only he was aware of the discovery, and that the Defendant was the multiple actors of the above G and multiple spons, the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to “Chewing sprinks, bottles, and bottles,” and continuously going into the F District, and going into the said F District, the Defendant could make the victim “at first school sprinks, and sprinks,” among these Gsponsing the victim. Neither would have any strong spick.

2. On June 3, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties: (a) at the police station I and the office of the Suyang-gu Sacheon-ro 63, Sayang-gu, Sayang-gu, Sayang-gu, Sayang-gu, Sacheon-gu, Sayang-gu, Sayang-gu, and the Defendant used the police officer who was arrested and taken custody of a flagrant offender under the suspicion of assaulting a taxi engineer G to continuously take a bath for the police officer who was in the above office to prepare other documents related to the above case; and (b) the police officer J of the above police station at the police station at the police station at the time of the preparation of the documents related to the above case “I am hick-gu, I am I” to the Defendant “I am hick-gu, I am hick-gu,” and assault the Defendant by means of taking the face of the J.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the preparation of investigation documents by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to H, J and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 136 (1) and Article 311 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the criminal liability of the defendant is not against the defendant, but it is against the defendant and the police officer who