Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and two months, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment of five months, and each of the defendants C shall be punished by imprisonment of eight months.

except that this shall not apply.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who engages in credit business under the trade name of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F and 204, and is specialized in credit card discount business (tentatively referred to as "credit card tin"). Defendant B operates “I” under the name of his spouse H, which is an Internet household sales company. Defendant C is engaged in the business of importing, processing and selling each of the reference values with the trade name of “J” and “L”.

1. Defendant A and B, at a place where the place at the end of June 2013 is unknown, provided that Defendant B entered into a credit card merchant agreement with the said I as the said I member shop and provided credit card terminals to Defendant A. Defendant A, who, under the name of the said member shop, concluded a credit card merchant agreement with the said I and concluded a credit card transaction with the said I member store, made a credit card payment by pretending that there was an actual transaction of goods, and provided a loan to the current financial service provider for an amount equivalent to approximately KRW 85% of the payment, and collected an amount equivalent to KRW 3-5% of the payment amount at the case cost.

Defendant

A around August 5, 2013, at the above G office, pretended to purchase goods or services, M with M’s new card (credit card number (N) without the sale of goods, and concluded sales slips through the above credit card terminal, and provided funds after deducting certain fees to the above M, as shown in attached Table 1, by December 31, 2013, as shown in attached Table 1, it pretended as if it sold goods of 309,311,710 won in total by 215 times until December 31, 2013, and provided money from the current financial service provider after deducting certain fees.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to sell goods and provided financing to others by means of credit card transactions.

2. Defendant A and C’s co-principal defendants around June 2013.