logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.07 2016고단5135
여신전문금융업법위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for ten months, and for eight months, for Defendant C, respectively.

except that this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On November 25, 2016, the Busan District Court sentenced six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Busan District Court and decided May 4, 2017.

No person shall make a loan by means of a transaction by credit cards in pretending the sale of goods or the provision of services, etc.

Defendant

On September 2015, Defendant A and Defendant B: (a) registered as a business operator in the name of Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government with the name of “F” in the name of Defendant A’s place of business; (b) provided a card terminal of “F” to a similar receiver, etc.; and (c) provided a fee for about 10% of the settlement price; and (d) provided a card terminal of “F” to Defendant A and Defendant B with a card terminal of Defendant A and Defendant B as a fee; and (c) provided a card terminal of Defendant A and Defendant B with a loan to receive the introduction fee from Defendant A and Defendant B on October 2015.

From September 21 to December 29, 2015, the Defendants conspireded to sell “H building” 14th floor near the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G G, and as if I purchased goods in an amount equivalent to KRW 10 million from the “F” to the “F”’s credit card terminal without selling goods or providing services, the Defendants pretended to make payments through a credit card, prepare the sales slip, and lend funds after deducting certain fees to I, and up to 473,27,590 won in total over 323 times, as indicated in the attached list of crimes, and then took part in the sales of the goods from the “F” to 204,27,590 won in total, and up to 205,200 won in total, up to 323 hours from September 21, 2015 to December 29, 2015 (the Defendant C was the maximum number of 320,000 won in total, up to 247, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. Instructions and relevant data of an enterprise suspected of receiving similar messages;

1.Each.

arrow