1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. According to the overall purport of the pleadings as a result of the commission of surveying and appraisal on the statement in Gap evidence No. 1 and the permanent salary bars of the Korea Land Information Corporation, the following facts are acknowledged: (a) the Plaintiff is registered as sharing shares of 115/229, the Defendant’s share of 114/29; and (b) the Plaintiff is occupying and using the portion of the claim in the above land; (c) the portion of 6m2 in the ship; (v) the portion of 6m27m2 in the ship; and (v) the portion of 104m2 in the ship.

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff purchased the part of the land indicated in the attached drawing out of C road 8m2, D field 45m2, E field 176m2, and the land indicated in attached Form 3(c), 5(5), and 176m2, and the Defendant specified the remainder of the land and completed the registration of ownership transfer with the co-ownership share for convenience.

The plaintiff and the defendant divided ownership of each specific purchased part. The plaintiff terminated the title trust of the above ship on the service of the complaint in this case on the part of the defendant, and therefore the defendant must implement the procedure for the registration of ownership transfer for the above part of the land.

B. The reasoning that the Plaintiff and the Defendant occupied and used each specific part of C road 8m2, D address 45m2, E field 176m2 in a permanent residence is insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff and the Defendant have a mutual title trust or a sectionally owned co-ownership relation with each of the above lands. The Plaintiff’s assertion is without merit.

3. The plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed on the ground that it is without merit.