1. The defendant

A. Connection each point of 2,10 m2, and 10 m2 of the annexed drawings, among the 159 m2 in a permanent residence.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of the same E large 631 square meters (hereinafter “each of the instant lands”) with the land of 159 square meters in a permanent residence, and the Defendant entered into a lease agreement with the Plaintiff on each of the instant land and occupied and used part of the land as a school site.

B. The term of each of the instant lands between the Plaintiff and the Defendant expired on May 31, 2013.

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, entry in Gap evidence 4-3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. In addition to the witness F’s testimony as a result of the appraisal by the appraiser F for the cause of the claim, the Defendant installed a fence on the line connected each point of 2,10 square meters of the attached Table 1,2,10 square meters of permanent residence C, among each land of this case, and indicated 2,3,4,5,6, 7, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 24 square meters of the same map in sequence, among 25 square meters of the land of this case, and the Defendant has the same duty to remove each part of 37 square meters of the land of this case and 34 square meters of the same map in order of 2,30 square meters of the same map, 14, 31, 20, 29, 28, 260 square meters of the same map, 14, 250 square meters of the same part of the land of this case, 230 square meters of the same land of this case.

3. Judgment on the defendant's assertion

A. Among the attached drawings, the Defendant does not occupy the Defendant’s respective slope parts outside the school fences, and the appraiser at the time of the instant survey and appraisal.