1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. On November 1, 2010, the Defendant is operating the Gangnambuk Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”); C is a person who received an operation for the heart marction of the heart in the Defendant Hospital on November 1, 2010; the Plaintiff A is her husband; the Plaintiff B is her husband; and the Plaintiff B is her husband.

B. C around October 6, 2010, while driving a vehicle, faced with the part front of the chest in the vehicle in which the collision occurred while driving the vehicle, and went to the address around 10:00 on October 20, 2010, and went to the Defendant hospital with a diagnosis of the trauma and the chest pain from the medical team of the Defendant hospital at around 11:10, after receiving a diagnosis of the respiratory eye from the medical team of the Defendant hospital, and was subject to a chest eye influencing, around 11:40, after hearing the necessity, method, side effect, and explanation of the directions, and preparing a written consent thereon, and was inspected with chest CT at around 11:47.

C. On October 21, 2010, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital diagnosed C with the heart equipment stand, the left scoke, the depth of the scoke, the expansion of the scoke, and the scoke in the heart. On October 21, 2010, the Defendant Hospital conducted the heart scoke in C, and as a result, diagnosed C with the expansion of the scoke in the scoke, the scoke in the scoke, the scoke in the scoke, the scoke in the scoke, the scoke in the scoke, the scoke in the scoke, and the scoke in the scoke.

On October 22, 2010, at around 15:00, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital removed C’s chest, and around October 10:32, 2010, after explaining C’s present condition (in the heart typosis), the purpose and effect of cardio-cerebrovascularing in the heart, the purpose and method of the examination, and the present possible merger certificate, etc. to C, and performing the said examination after preparing a written consent therefor from C, the result of the said examination was that there was no place to prevent the cardio-cerebrscular.

E. On October 28, 2010, at around 14:43, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital had an interview with C with scarcity and outpatient, and the respiratory difficulty caused by scarcity was found to have occurred due to scarcity, and thus, the Defendant Hospital was released from the hospital around 16:44.

On the other hand, C's birth is 15.0% on the same day.